![]() ![]() Ultimately, providing affordable higher education to Colorado students will require more funding, and we think that funding should be targeted to help the students most in need - lower-income and first-generation students.Īgain, CMU is a leader among Colorado’s high education institutions in serving those first-generation students who we should prioritize - just under half of incoming freshman and graduating seniors are first-generation college students. ![]() This is combined with federal and state work-study programs that give students an opportunity, as previous generations had, to work their way through their pursuit of higher education. MAVworks is a university-funded work-study program which allows students to pay for part of their education with a university job. It has also increased its own institutional support for student financial aid by more than $10 million over the last five years alone. It has also come up with innovative ways, like the MAVworks program, to provide financial aid to students. If we’re looking for examples of institutions trying to hold the line on costs, we’d suggest looking at Colorado Mesa University, which has managed to keep its annual tuition and fees the lowest of our state universities. We don’t think this was a conscious policy decision to defund higher education, but rather a change gradual enough to go somewhat unnoticed. Over the last two decades, the cost of a public university has flipped from two-thirds paid by state taxpayers to today students themselves bearing two-thirds of the cost. We certainly see it, at best, as a ham-handed attempt to address a real problem - college education has become too expensive, and the majority of that cost burden has shifted from taxpayers onto the students. It’s easy to see why many people see this plan as unfair. It’s likely to cancel debt for students who have an ability to pay and miss others who sacrificed earlier to pay off student debt. We see this plan as being helpful to some students who are in real need, but also arbitrary in its application. The cancellation of thousands of dollars of individual student debt by the Biden administration has proven to be a divisive program, especially in a community like Grand Junction. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() In fact, in the early days of the phone, the pranksters sometimes were telephone-company employees. This is probably particularly satisfying for kids, who usually carry out adults’ demands. “In executing the prank, he is able to assume a position of authority … make demands … and have the majority of these demands carried out,” Harris writes. Then the prankster calls over and over again in the next 15 minutes, “and if they answer let go a blood curdling scream.” “Telephone pranks serve as a means of releasing hostility and frustration with a minimum risk of retaliation.” In one variation, the caller warns them not to answer the phone for 15 minutes “because if they do, the telephone repairman will receive a fatal shock,” as one survey respondent told Harris. In another common genre of phone prank, the caller pretends to be from the telephone company and tries to get the answerer to do something, like blow in the phone to “fix” it. “Pranksters become aware of the power of words in unusual or different contexts.” “There is also a certain amount of linguistic delight in discovery,” Harris writes. “Do you have pop?” “Yes.” “Send him home Mom wants him.” Perhaps the most well-known is the “catch question,” à la “Is your refrigerator running?” A few others: There are several classic forms this can take. “Telephone pranks serve … as a means of releasing hostility and frustration with a minimum risk of retaliation,” Dresser writes. The calls are almost always made in groups, her survey found, so there’s a bonding element, and “the caller becomes the center of attention among his peers.”ĭresser, Jorgensen, and Harris all note that a prank call also serves as a sort of low-stakes rebellion, a chance to embarrass the adults that usually have power over them. In her 1973 paper “Telephone Pranks ,” the folklorist Norine Dresser writes that the pranks “serve several social needs” for kids that age. The few studies on prank calls that exist estimate that the pastime is most popular among kids from ages 11 to 14 or 15. ![]() In each case the denouement was highly farcical, and the reputed corpses are now hunting in a lively manner for that telephonistįrom then to now, most people have tended to make prank calls during a brief window of adolescence. A Grave Joke on Undertakers.-Some malicious wag at Providence, R.I., has been playing a grave practical joke on the undertakers there, by summoning them over the telephone to bring freezers, candlesticks and coffins for persons alleged to be dead. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |